this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
10 points (75.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The number one problem with polling is who they survey.

Most polls will tell you "We surveyed xxx number of likely voters..."

(Record scratch)

Wait a second... How are you defining "likely"?

That wiggle room gives pollsters the ability to cherry pick their audience and you often have to dig into how they define "likely."

Registered to vote? High enthusiasm? Voted in the past two elections?

What is likely for one poll may not be likely for other polls.

That's one of the reasons polling was off in 2016. "Voted in the last 2 elections", well, Trump drew out people who hadn't voted. Because they hadn't voted they weren't counted as "likely."

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/elections/registered-voters-vs-likely-voters.html

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's why I think the polls are off now. The number of 18-30 year olds registrations is off the charts in previous years and they are not counted as likely voters.

Young women are going to be key to this election I think. They are pissed off and are chomping at the bit to vote.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, in 2016 and 2020 polls underestimated Trump voters. Pollsters know he has voters who aren’t reflected in polls, and they’re consciously trying to account for it.

But I’m hopeful that this year it’s the opposite, that polls are underestimating Harris support. Young voters, or even women in conservative families who say they’re voting for Trump, but deep down want Harris to win.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

My thinking exactly as well.

It's spin if they are not adjusting how and who they poll as technology advances and as new generations enter the voting pool.

If they're only polling people who pick up an unknown phone call, they're going to get mainly boomers and geriatrics. Younger generations in general screen their phone calls and don't answer unknown numbers, and, let's face it, phone calls are a terrible engagement mechanism anymore.

I'm a xennial and I have Google's call screening feature - I never answer unknown numbers, and look closely at the caller's intentions even before accepting any calls. I would love to participate in this unicorn that is a presidential poll, but I'm not doing it through an unsolicited phone call.

Edit - then you have this use of polling also

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are other ways of polling. I'm regularly polled by Gallup via email (hey, those $1 and $5 Amazon gift cards add up!) and there are other agencies that do it by email as well.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How did you get into that pipeline? I've never gotten one of those emails

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Started with a postcard of all things... "Hey, sign up here!" so I did.

It might have started when I was on a business trip in Vegas and I got invited to a TV show survey panel.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Divided We Fall - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Divided We Fall:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://dividedwefall.org/election-polls-prediction-accuracy/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support