299
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Blood is on your hands, forced-birther conservatives.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

They just don't care.

The number one cause of death for children in the US is gun violence, and they still fight every single effort to stop it.

I don't know what it will take to stop the insanity of the GOP, but it's not going to be dead women.

[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago
[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

"hooray another dead abortionist, and the evil abortion doctors were prevented from killing another baby" is probably how they'd spin in

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

But think of all the babies they’re saving and forcing to live in poverty with parents that couldn’t afford them and a government that won’t support them.

[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

More wage-slaves and sacrifices for pointless wars.

[-] Tot@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

She basically died because she told the doctors she had taken miso. At this point she absolutely needed a D&C but because Georgia law said that's bAd, doctors risked losing their licenses to help her. And by the time they were going to, it was too late.

But hey, it was a woman who died, and she was black, so definitely not the kind of person they care about.

Ugh. So disgusting.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

What is miso and what is a D&C?

Shorthand is fun but I’m just lost.

[-] abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I did a quick Google search, and I'm guessing miso is the ulcer treatment misoprostol that you shouldn't take during pregnancy. A d and c is a dilation and cutterage, an invasive surgical procedure that removes something from the uterus. In this instance the something was a nonviable pregnancy that went awry from possibly the medication (or other factors).

Admittedly i was also confused about miso, and immediately thought soup? I was extremely incorrect

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Now I weirdly want soup..

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

These doctors are spineless too. First do no harm, they broke their oath out of fear of the law.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I've included the text (from https://doctors.practo.com/the-hippocratic-oath-the-original-and-revised-version/) below. I've also set in bold the phrase which I believe refutes your contention.

If the law prevents you from fulfilling the oath, then you are not able to fulfill the oath.


"I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant:

I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow. I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.

I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife or the chemist's drug. I will not be ashamed to say "I know not," nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient's recovery.

I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty.

Above all, I must not play at God.

I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person's family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.

I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.

I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm. If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help."

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Still spinless to have the ability to save a life and you don't just because some piece of shit politicians said no because their sky man said something 2000 years ago.

[-] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

And risk getting fired and not being able to save any other lives in however many years you would've practicioned otherwise?

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why do doctor and nurse strikes work? Because when there are no doctors or nurses it puts pressure on those in power to act. If all doctors refuse to follow the law it can have a similar effect as a strike. Plus all the bad press the lawmakers will get if doctor after doctor is arrested. It will be a media shit storm.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Who knows, maybe they are Internet keyboard warriors in their spare time.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

MSNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for MSNBC:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/amber-thurman-death-georgia-abortion-ban-rcna171301
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
299 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19080 readers
4331 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS