'We were fined £50 each over £3 extra train fare' (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 1 month ago by Mex@feddit.uk to c/rail@feddit.uk

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Railway companies lose £240 million every year."

Good. Fuck them.

[-] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Does this also apply to public train companies? Would you prefer everyone just drive everywhere?

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

No. If they were really public, it wouldn’t be measured as a loss. Like my city's free buses aren’t losing money, they are providing a necessary service.

[+] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works -15 points 1 month ago

It's still a fare they could have charged, calling it something different doesn't change the fact that someone has to pay to keep the trains running. Why should the taxpayer be the one on the hook? If it's such an important service the people who use it would be willing to pay for it.

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 16 points 1 month ago

Yeah!

Why should I pay for schools, I don't have kids? It's not like it benefits our entire country's future.

Why should I pay for hospitals, I'm not sick. Not like my taxes are being used to help people who really really need it, and whose families are devastated

I don't have access to a railway station either, should I pay for quieter, safer roads and communities, and making life easier for my fellow citizens?

You sound like a yank

[-] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago

Kids don't have jobs and people don't choose to get sick. People do choose to ride trains. Do you just think nobody should ever pay for anything? Haven't we seen enough times how that works in practice?

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago

Nobody chooses to ride trains except old steam trains, stuff like the Orient Express

99% of people use trains because they need them, usually to get to work.

You'd be about as effective an economist as Liz The Lettuce

[-] Tweak@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

People absolutely do choose trains over cars, when the train is actually viable. Just because that isn't a thing in the UK doesn't mean it couldn't be.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Didn't read the article huh?

[-] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

I did read the article, I think the fine was too harsh for an honest mistake. But I wasn't responding to the article, I was responding to someone celebrating the railways losing money because of people not paying their fares.

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

I'm guessing you didn't read the article, about how thousands of people are getting fined unfairly?

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Because it incentivizes the most pro social option, especially in regards to land use. When more people use trains less roads are needed, less parking space is needed, and less traffic occurs. Subsidizing trains as a driver is significantly more sensible to me than the fact that my taxes pay for meat subsidies despite me being a vegetarian for example.

[-] rowdyrockets@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I would have happily put that on a credit card and issued a chargeback while they were still standing there.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024

58 points (96.8% liked)

UK Rail and Trains

215 readers

8 users here now

Talk about the UK rail network.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Mex@feddit.uk