Plan to regulate access to online porn in California dies quietly in Legislature (calmatters.org)

submitted 2 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago

These laws don’t actually block access to porn.

The web is massive and there are too many sites that are hosted outside of the US that doesn’t care about a single state’s law.

People need to parent their damn kids. Talk to them about sex, or enable your the parental controls on their devices if that’s how you want to roll. Don’t nanny everyone else.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

There are a lot of things being shoved down throats on these websites, Christianity is not one of them. I'll leave that job to my government!

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 2 months ago

It’s a huge part of our economy! But also, sorry Repubs. For all the rural areas, we have massive urban centers that won’t put up with your bullshit. Tell someone else what to do.

[-] BigDotNet@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

AFAIK biggest porn lobby is in California.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 21 points 2 months ago

They don't call is Silicone Valley for nothing

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Nah all the porn left for Vegas after we started requiring condoms and testing.

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 13 points 2 months ago

Good, fuck off with this fascist bullshit

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

That's COMMUNISM! REAL FREEDOM is when you have to give the Government your ID in order to see Boobs!

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

State approved boobs, like in Australia, where boob size A is illegal, as it can be seen as a child's body.

[-] shani66@ani.social 6 points 2 months ago

Glad at least one state has it's shit together.

[-] Anissem@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Like it ever had a chance

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago

Calmatters - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Calmatters:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://calmatters.org/politics/2024/08/california-porn-id-legislation-dies/

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024

88 points (91.5% liked)

politics

19072 readers

4584 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News