this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
319 points (99.4% liked)

Cybersecurity - Memes

3281 readers
7 users here now

Only the hottest memes in Cybersecurity

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To be clear, not all companies are like this.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disclosure to the company is only half of responsible disclosure.

  1. Report bug to company privately, and specify a date where the details will be made public. 90 days is a good starting point, but there is room for negotiation up or down depending on how complex the bug is (more complex = harder for someone else to discover = less urgency to patch) and how much impact there is (more impact = more risk if someone malicious discovers it = more urgency)
  2. While you wait, apply for a CVE number and determine a CVSS score - this helps signal how critical the bug is
  3. Once the company publishes a patch (or the embargo date is reached, which ever comes first), publish details of the research

The point of responsible disclosure is to balance the vendors need to have time to fix security bugs before the details are publicly known against the customers right to know that there are unpatched bugs so they can take measures to mitigate their risks. It isn't a free pass for vendors to never patch things

[–] knolord@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Not so in Germany, where you can be hit with charges by the company. In one famous case in 2021, the conservative party pressed charges against a data researcher, after she responsibly disclosed a massive data leak via their party app. After the court determined, that afromentioned data was insufficiently secured, those charges were dropped.

This proved to the tech-side in Germany, that responsible disclosure just harms yourself in the end and that German companies (and political parties) might as well go fuck themselves.

Edit: Grammar

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Man germany at the highest clown rating in the digital era.

[–] cron@feddit.org 18 points 1 year ago

Somewhere in the HQ of the german conservative party

[–] KamikazeRusher@lemm.ee 57 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Disclosed responsibly

Received a Cease & Desist order with threat of litigation if released to the public

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] cron@feddit.org 17 points 1 year ago

No good deed goes unpunished

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's very responsible of you to be thinking of the poor corporation; they needed a hand from a hardworking volunteer like yourself and you did the responsible thing and made their lives easier. Hurray!

Release the vulnerability to the dark net.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

we acknowledge this is a zero day threat and is being actively exploited but we don't see the need to release an out of bad patch.
This exploit will be resolved on our next patch ETA next month.

Looking at you non specific firewall vendor.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At least you're reporting legit vulnerabilities. Meanwhile I'm over here swarmed by "vulnerability reports" about SPF for a fukken subdomain that never gets used for email, and has it configured correctly already 😑

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You should look up Beg Bounties by the guy that does haveibeenpwned

Edit: here it is for others to see

https://www.troyhunt.com/beg-bounties/

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I've not heard of it, I'll check it out!

[–] cron@feddit.org 4 points 1 year ago

I have reported a few vulnerabilities in the last years, but sometimes it is hard to judge whether or not it is a real vulnerability or just a minor bug.

But I'd rather report one bug too much than keep silent about it.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Then people wonder why it just gets leaked online.