237

Trump's daily statements threaten to prejudice jury pool in D.C. elections case, prosecutors warn (www.cnbc.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“Daily” statements by former President Donald Trump “threaten to prejudice the jury pool” in the federal case where he is charged with crimes related to trying to reverse his loss in the 2020 election, prosecutors said Tuesday.

Prosecutors made that claim as they pushed back on a call by Trump’s lawyers to allow a three-week briefing process for Judge Tanya Chutkan to decide whether “every ordinary” court filing that refers to sensitive materials should be placed on the court’s public docket.

top 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 81 points 1 year ago

You can see the world class legal work coming from Smiths office and the hastily thrown together mess of a response from Trumps 8th string legal team. Jack Smith follows established legal protocol. They fire back saying he can’t do that because he never asked them. He responds we did Fucking ask you and we made sure the judge was aware. The judge has to once again waste more time so these shit dicks can try to technicality their way to a victory.

And what’s so frustrating is that really Smith and Chutkan can make zero mistakes but we are expected to tolerate the ravings of a psychotic maniac and the absolute piss poor legal decisions of his lawyers. If there’s even one fuck up they can appeal it to hell and get him off.

Put this man on trial. Show that he is a fucking criminal. Send his ass to jail. Just this once, the planets need to align and these people we have trusted with the duty of enforcing our laws need to get the job done.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

The judge has to once again waste more time so these shit dicks can try to technicality their way to a victory.

They want to draw things out as long as possible, hope Trump wins the election, and then argue that he can't be convicted as a sitting President. If he loses the election and can't trigger a successful coup to instate him as Dear Leader he'll be Trumping his pants over any court cases that haven't resolved at that point.

[-] ronalicious@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

apologies for the low brow comment, but...

fuck this guy. so over it.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

They're trying to, man. That's what these indictments are for.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Time to get this guy into prison.

[-] esadatari@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it’s worth noting that we should be reminded of the rosenbergs if you want to see what should and used to be done to those who sold state secrets. and those weren’t state secrets that led to unprecedented amounts of CIA assets being killed.

if it wouldn’t turn his dumb ass into a martyr by his followers, i’d say he should meet the same fate the rosenbergs had.

as it is, with how hard he fucked over the CIA, i won’t be surprised if he suddenly has a heart attack or disappears years down the line.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If he suddenly has a heart attack, I doubt many would suspect the CIA, even if they were involved. The guy seemingly has no regard for his own health.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh no, all the MAGA people will never believe it's Trump's own fault. It would have to be murder and then Trump's a martyr.

[-] Putykat@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

LOCK HIM UP!

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

“Daily Statements.” Is that what he calls the bowel movements coming out of his mouth?

[-] detalferous@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Lock him up!

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

My most sincere hope is that he survives 5 or 10 years of misery and humiliation in a supermax.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

“Daily” statements by former President Donald Trump “threaten to prejudice the jury pool” in the federal case where he is charged with crimes related to trying to reverse his loss in the 2020 election, prosecutors said Tuesday.

Are you going to actually do something about it? No? Then shut the fuck up, because he's not going to stop. As long as your answer to "What are you going to do about it?" continues to be "Nothing" in practice, he is going to continue to do this. So either do something about it or expect it to get worse. He's not going to shut up on his own, no matter how much legal advice he's given.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

She should move his court date up a week and see if he wants to say anything...

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023

237 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18769 readers

3333 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News