Seems lenient to me, particularly for a repeat offender.

What a fucking ~~dipshit~~ sexual assaulter this surgeon is.

FTFY

Edit:

She agreed to perform the exam and began to explain the procedure to Innantuono, the document states. Before she could leave the room to give Innantuono time to undress, the surgeon removed his bottoms, exposing himself to the woman, it reads.

“This startled Ms. X,” the document reads. She then asked the surgeon to cover himself, which he did not do, the ruling states. Instead, it says Ms. X moved to cover the man’s genitals herself using a towel, which he soon removed.

According to the decision, Innantuono then requested Ms. X perform an exam that was not indicated on his requisition form – an inguinal hernia exam – which is done in the groin area, near the pubic bones.

The surgeon then asked the woman to palpate him for hernias, "although that is not the role of an ultrasound technician," the ruling reads.

However, “because of Dr. Iannantuono’s position as a senior surgeon in the hospital, she felt compelled to be cooperative and deferential,” it continues.

As Ms. X examined one side of his groin, Iannantuono once again removed a towel placed over his genitals, grabbed Ms. X’s hand to reposition it and in doing so, caused her to touch his penis. The ruling states he did the same on the other side, and then for a third time, after making her repeat the first side.

Before leaving, Iannantuono stood from the table, allowing the towels to drop to the floor and once again exposing himself to the woman, the tribunal found.

@xc2215x @ijeff

Considering this wasn't his first time I'd say he should have lost his license.

Unfortunately we have a dire shortage of physicians so he gets leniency instead.