Ardour is the best FOSS option, but I personally like REAPER a lot more because it has extremely flexible routing, JS plugins whose code you can read and edit within the DAW, and extremely flexible interface design that you can fit into any workflow. Also REAPER works on Linux. REAPER allows you to use the free trial indefinitely with full functionality (although I do own my copy, and it's one of the few pieces of software I think is worth paying for).
this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
17 points (94.7% liked)
Music and audio production
1109 readers
4 users here now
Need a tip or want to show off your latest music production?
It’s here. Free software will be preferred but all are welcome. Don’t just post links without explanations, we expect you to comment your post or it will be moderated. If you ask something, be as precise as possible, provide context. And now, let’s talk audio!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Have you ever done any plugin development for REAPER? I dug into the JUICE framework for VST2/3 for a bit, and came out of that experience a little suicidal. (Kidding... mostly.)
JS code seems like something I could do if it allowed for some of the realtime processing that C++ can handle. (Comparing a scripting engine to what is essentially a separate complied app is likely a pipe dream, I know.)
Have you ever done any plugin development for REAPER? I dug into the JUICE framework for VST2/3 for a bit, and came out of that experience a little suicidal. (Kidding... mostly.)
I've dabbled with JUCE, and I have a couple projects in mind that I'm definitely going to do with JUCE.
JS is way easier than JUCE. It can absolutely do real-time processing.
The limitation IMO is that you're "stuck with" REAPER's GUI style, you can't take advantage of external C++ libraries, and you have to have REAPER or ReaJS or some other program to compile your JS code. If you just want to write a helper plugin, get your feet wet, or target only REAPER users, JS is a fantastic place to start. Here is REAPER's introduction to JSFX. You can probably read it in a night.
JUCE is, IMO, the "professional" option for plugin development, but happens to also be FOSS. Besides its signal processing and math abstractions, it also has a ton of stuff for generating custom GUI. If you paid for a plugin in the last 10 years, chances are it was written with JUCE. If you plan on commercializing a plugin or you just wanna go the whole hog and make it beautiful and cross platform, JUCE is the way to go. But yes, it is extremely complicated 😂.
I strongly recommend watching ADC (Audio Developer Conference) videos which are affiliated with the JUCE developers and usually offer code samples for talks where code is used. Additionally, MatKat did a free in-depth tutorial on how to write an EQ plugin with JUCE.
Beyond that, there are other choices, like RACKAFX, but IMO JUCE is the best choice unless you plan on keeping your plugins to yourself.
Actually, for plugin development, REAPER is a no-brainer IMO (even on Linux with YaBridge) for testing (other than JUCE's plugin debugger) because it has some compatibility settings and knobs you can tweak with regard to how it sees VSTs.
Rock on! Thanks for the info, experience and opinions.
You probably saved me hours of research and chasing dead ends, so that was awesome.
Ardour is the most popular (and probably most robust) option for Linux, and also available for Windows and MacOS. I don't think Reaper is open source, but it's "free" and by all accounts from people I know who use it, it's a great DAW.
Reaper, because Cockos understands and respects their customer base. Additionally, Reaper is top-tier quality.
I use Ardour. It looks pretty complicated to use at first glance, but everything you would need is there in one of the four modes in the top right corner.
I've tried Reaper for the plugins and the generally good reputation, but I couldn't understand the empty interface whatsoever.