60 greedy assholes who need to pay more taxes are backing the oldest, most corrupt nominee in American history.
Also most fascist. Billionaires should not exist, and I have thoughts on the best way for those particular billionaires to not exist.
Hmm perhaps some kind of ergonomic contraption could be devised for the purpose
Totally agree that billionaires should not exist.
I hate the fact that there are over 60 billionaires. I hate the fact that there is more than 0 billionaires.
Pushing hard for those uninformed votes, I see. Anyone with an ounce of political knowledge could tell you republican policies are never anti-establishment.
No no, you misunderstand. It's antiesablishment of sensible laws and protections
I dont know when I crawled into a mirror but if I could please just exit.
Trump should probably drop out of the race.
Too old...
We need a website that keeps track of these billionaires' locations. It would be nice to keep an eye on our oligarchs' on a day-to-day basis.
Anti-establishment, LOL.
WTAF. Only in upside down la-la land can a guy born with a helluva silver, no, platinum, spoon in his mouth, promising even more handouts to bazillionaires, be considered "anti-establishment".
I mean of course billionaires support someone who can be easily lobbied.
Elon giving simp here
The fact that this is significant and will probably influence the election as a whole shows in complete fullness that America doesn't exist in a democracy ... it's a plutocracy, an oligarchy or an aristocracy ... it definitely isn't a democracy.
It used to be. Then Reagan got elected, and that's the point they started to dismantle everything good about our government
Ugh that look on musks face, this is all I can think of: https://www.facebook.com/sunnygifs/videos/a-little-closer-to-the-hole-sir-alwayssunny-itsalwayssunnyinphiladelphia-iasip-i/174367048180140/
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News