this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
560 points (96.1% liked)

politics

25004 readers
2558 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meanwhile, 44 percent backed the American tradition of competing branches of government as a model, if sometimes “frustrating,” system.

Why would people want to live under an authoritarian’s thumb? It’s rooted, experts say, in a psychological need for security—real or perceived—and a desire for conformity, a goal that becomes even more acute as the country undergoes dramatic demographic and social changes. People also like to obey a strong leader who will protect the group—especially if it is the “right” group whose interests will be protected. Recall the Trump supporter who, during the 2019 government shutdown, complained, “He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sagrotan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Here they go through Europe biggest fuck ups 90 years later. I'd say enjoy the ride but they'll pull the whole world in.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This country is cooked that number is way too high.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At this point, I would be unsurprised if a third of Americans voted for an industrial meat shredder for President, even after it had been repeatedly and clearly explained they would be marched into it at gunpoint if it won. The lower part of our bell curve is… well… very, very low.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I hate this country more and more every day.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It has worked SO WELL for...

Well I wouldn't want to bother them with history.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If you ask the same people if they would want a leftist military regime or authoritarian governement they would beg for democracy. These people have no scrouples. End of the day they just want to be left alone like everyone else. It's just lashing out because they themselves don't want to change.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ballistic_86@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How very in-American of them. I thought those conservatives were all about 1776 and independence from a king/dictator. I guess it’s more like they want their king is charge to crush anyone who has slightly different views.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I read some research somewhere that found that about a third of the people in any given country are authoritarian shitheads (paraphrasing). The problem is that the unique structure of the US system of government gives said shitheads outsized power and representation relative to their numbers.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

Well, good news for them!

Anyway, I blame the 24 hour news cycle.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I have a hard time believing the questions or something is not skewed to get such a high result.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"No more terrible disaster could befall your people than for them to fall into the hands of a ~~Hero~~ [Dictator]"

Pardot Kynes

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm 100% in favor of me being a dictator for life but otherwise I'm pretty sure democracy is a good idea.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

I hate this so much.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Some people's need to be ruled by a King is very real. It's how their brain works.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

So much for "Give me liberty or give me death!".

I guess a Christian fascist theocracy is a good option for some.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only we could give them what they want and let them have their own shitty fascist country somewhere so they'd leave us alone.

load more comments (1 replies)

Thank God we're not a democracy.

- Republicans

[–] bcoffy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Weirdly, the percentage who agree with that statement, by political affiliation, are: Left - 25% Right - 29% Center - 37%?!

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a military regime or authoritarian leader

Two completely different things in this climate. Anyone else remember when Gen. Miley literally went behind Trump's back to assure China that the military would block any of his (possible) tantrums?

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 6 points 1 year ago

I’m sure 32% of those 32% would say that authority should allow abortions.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Silver lining, we outnumber them 2:1.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One step closer to: "We forgot how to make cheese, y'all!"

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›