674
submitted 2 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Ha ha ha, democracy, sure.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Fucking filth

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 9 points 2 months ago

The system of the USA only works, if the president is a good person, caring for the good of the nation and all of its citizens.

Trump and his cronies are bad people though, and the house of cards that is the constitution and the separation of powers falls apart.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Well, if the legal justice system won't do it's job, maybe a vig- ...oh wait...

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

So nice of his loyal toadie to let him off the hook like that.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

In the unlikely event the law still applies to Donald Trump and this gets overturned on appeal, does this mean it can go to a new judge?

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The process goes district court -> appeals court -> Supreme Court. Cannon is a district (trial) Court judge; if Smith chooses to appeal the dismissal (which he will because her dismissal reasoning is dogshit) it will go to the 11th Circuit in Atlanta. After the appeals court rules on the procedure used in the trial court (with NO NEW ARGUEMENTS!), then either party could choose to make a final appeal to the Supreme court- and we all know what they will rule on. However the Supreme Court is not obligated to take on cases referred from an appellate court. And nowhere in this process can they refer to a new trial judge.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 2 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Washington — The federal judge overseeing the case alleging former President Donald Trump mishandled sensitive government documents after leaving the White House has dismissed the charges against him.

This is a developing story and will be updated.


The original article contains 37 words, the summary contains 37 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Davidjjdj@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

What a fucking joke

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

She is another piece of the corruption puzzle that needs expungement

[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

I don't want to say I'm surprised by this, but JFC...

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Does it count as violence if I hope (and only that) that "someone" "takes care" of her? Obviously rule of law means nothing to these people so it's just tit for tat.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
674 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18870 readers
3849 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS