674
submitted 2 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Thann@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 months ago

Special councils usurp legislative authority???

All the legislature can do is pass laws! If those laws never get enforced there is no legislative authority!

Cannon has ursurped legislative authority...

[-] mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 months ago

The guy can do anything... unreal.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Except hold a glass of water with one hand. Or walk down a gentle slope unassisted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 months ago

It's interesting to think it's taken a long time before a President was able to so obviously expose the cracks in the American constitution. It took someone entirely without shame or integrity to do so, but he did it during his first term and his second is going to be even more abusive. How does America fix this system going forwards? With the country so divided and polarised, it feels like another civil war might be the only way to solve that, but a civil war is unthinkable. But then so much else that was unthinkable has already happened in recent years.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

This is why someone tried to assassinate Trump the other day.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The Roberts court is a joke and obviously delaying any rulings they can until after the election to protect the wealthy and powerful from the law everyone else is restricted under. Cannon just takes the stupidity one step further.

All hail the oligarchs /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

The appellate court is gonna reverse that immediately.

And if they don’t: I guess it was nice having an illusion of a justice system for a while.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

The headline should say "Corrupt Judge dismisses Trump documents case"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnbalancedFox@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

US Presidents cam really do anything it seems...

[-] x4740N@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

I'm glad I don't live in america but if that idiot gets in there is potential threats to other countries

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago

This man will never see another legal consequences in his life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago
[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's actually not. The more worrying proposition was that she waited for a jury to be seated -- attaching jeopardy -- and then dismissing the charges with prejudice.

This certainly pushes it way past the election, but that seemed a certainty anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
674 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4168 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS