22
submitted 5 months ago by databender@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

See title; I'm considering it, but the courses bundles are expensive

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ipacialsection@startrek.website 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm currently on the RHCSA path myself, and I can tell you that the courses are not worth the thousands that Red Hat charges. There are plenty of unofficial video courses on YouTube and Udemy and study guides and practice tests on GitHub that are free or cheap, and other resources for every individual study topic, which will be good enough.

However, though I can't speak from experience, it seems like the cert itself will look good enough on a resume to justify the investment of $500 and a month of studying.

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The only people I have known with certs didn't have educations. Generally, the fewer degrees, the more certs. There are exceptions.

If you have a PhD or Masters, then certifications are unlikely worth it.

If you don't have a Bachelors, then certs are critical. Many jobs will just reject you.

A Bachelors is where certs seem to do the most good.

All of this in my part of the USA (Midwest and West) and speciality (HPC). I have been involved in hiring in several organizations.

[-] gbin@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

Is it something you cannot learn by yourself or the certification is valuable for your career?

[-] databender@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I just don't want to be a windows systems engineer anymore, and I'm having trouble getting interviews for linux administration roles.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

If it's free, why not.

Will it help you get a job? I've never hired anyone based on a certification, because it doesn't mean experience. Experience is what gets people hired.

Doctors don't get hired without first doing a residency. Mechanics don't get hired because they know all the parts on a car. And I won't get hired by a law firm for simply scoring 99% on an LSAT.

[-] thirteene@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Depends on your end goal, don't pay for yourself. Tech is hard to break into, certificates can help elevate your resume when you do not have a network to leverage. It's often good to "top off" your resume when market trends shift and you are lacking experience. For instance right now AWS certificates are likely strong additions if you don't have any cloud background. My rhcsa helped get my first job and is a positive for legacy LAMP and java shops. Trending forward: you will primarily be using it to support Linux based docker containers and a lot of the networking and hardware configuration will be obfuscated away. There is a non-zero amount of file ownership and user groups; but existing organizations will have figured that out already.

[-] aedyr@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Like some other replies said, it probably won't get you a job by itself. But it may get you the interview if it's the distinguishing factor between you and an equivalent candidate.

I got RHCSA (and later RHCE), and I think they were worthwhile. On cost, I would not go out of pocket for the Red Hat training if that's the bundle you're referring to. That stuff is priced for people that are being funded by their companies. Personally, I did self-study using Sander van Vugt's materials. He has both books and videos for RHCSA, depending on your learning style. I found them to be excellent preparation for the exam.

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

It depends on what you’re getting it for and why. Also, never pay for training and certifications, especially the pricey ones. It should be your employer paying for it.

[-] databender@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

For sure, my company is willing to pay for it, I wouldn't be paying for it myself.

I just don't want to work with windows anymore, and every job I get is windows centric; therefore I get a small amount of linux experience on my resume and the cycle continues. I'm contemplating getting the RHCSA and the RHCSE in order to get linux-centric roles (because although I'm down to take a cut in pay and settle for a junior position, most of the jobs available seem to be for senior or mid-level positions).

[-] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Have you considered the cheaper LFCS (Linux Foundation Certified Sysadmin) instead? It might be easier for the company to "swallow" and it's more general Linux instead of mainly Red Hat based. I took it this year and it's pretty standard System Administrator stuff.

[-] databender@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I'll look into that, thanks!

[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

My employer paid for a course heavily based on it (No cert, but condensed and more useful), and for my time. One tutor and two pupils over a week.

I found it moderately interesting, and slightly useful. It was the most relevant training available for administrating our (then) CentOS 5/6/7 servers. There were bits that didn't transfer across to CentOS, mostly the proprietary RHEL software aspects which we largely skipped. There was much that was useful for any linux distro.

Highlight for me was properly learning awk during it - I still use that every day.

[-] insufferableninja 1 points 5 months ago

i got the RHCSA about 15 years ago when i was trying to switch careers. the company that hired me did so because i had the cert, and my income tripled overnight. so for me it was definitely worth it.

Is the RHCSA worth it?

I don't know. What's the RHCSA? Let's check the description. Maybe they'll explain.

See title

Hmm... :/

[-] ScottE@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Don't know why you are being voted down, you are 100% correct. RTLAAU.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
22 points (95.8% liked)

Linux

48654 readers
536 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS