A fucking reprimand.
For an absolute overstep of boundaries and abuse of power.
To someone who, given his past actions mentioned in the article, could not care less.
That is just the most toothless, disappointing response. I undersand if there's not more that can be done, but that in and of itself is a goddamn problem.
I believe they are elected so that's probably why they are only giving him a reprimand. I'm not sure what their specific judiciary laws are for district courts are there but there may be nothing that can be done short of either losing the next election or perhaps the chief judge clearing his docket forever more.
About Us
We are community-driven and dedicated to celebrating the diverse and inclusive spirit of Minnesota. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or simply fascinated by the Land of 10,000 Lakes, you'll find a warm and welcoming community here. Our goal is to foster meaningful discussions, share local news and events, and create a safe space for everyone to connect and engage.
Rules and Guidelines
Be Kind and Respectful: Treat others with empathy, respect, and understanding. We embrace diversity and encourage civil discourse. Personal attacks, hate speech, discrimination, and harassment will not be tolerated.
Stay on Topic: Keep your posts and comments relevant to Minnesota. Let's focus on discussing local issues, events, news, and culture.
No Spam or Self-Promotion: We love to support local businesses and initiatives, but please refrain from excessive self-promotion or spamming. Posts must provide value to the community.
Avoid Sensationalism: When sharing news articles or stories, please provide accurate and reliable sources. Avoid clickbait titles or exaggerated claims.
No Illegal Activities: Do not promote or encourage illegal activities or engage in any discussions that violate the law.