182
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 42 points 3 months ago

Fuck that traitor. I'm not sure how he isn't facing charges.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago

Not only is he not facing charges, he is currently being paid by U.S. taxpayers.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 12 points 3 months ago

He's a retired general so I'm sure he earns a pension, if nothing else.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

After all his shit? Fuck

Edit: does he get a Dishonorable Discharge?

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He cannot be dishonorably discharged.

Only uncommissioned warrant officers (W-1) and enlisted members can be sentenced by a general court-martial to a punitive dishonorable discharge.

All commissioned officers, from W-2 up to O-10, as well as cadets and midshipmen, can only be dismissed by the punitive sentence of a general court-martial.

There is a distinct legal difference between the two types of punitive discharges, although for practical purposes the effects of both are very similar.

The only way to dismiss any commissioned officer, cadet, or midshipman from their Office is to convene a general court-martial, and obtain a conviction at trial that survives appeals until the convening authority is able to take final actions.

In theory, it can be done. And perhaps it will be, in spite of the difficulties of recalling a retired officer to stand trial by general court-martial; but probably not in this political climate.

He’s just cruising on his U.S. taxpayer provided pension, taking money from Putin, planning coups, and spreading the Q-Anon ideology.

What a guy.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In the Old West people were hanged by their necks until dead for less. You used to face a firing squad if you were found to be a traitor to your country.

I'm not saying we go back to execution without trial, but we should at least have a speedy trial and some sort of consequences for a deterrent/punishment. Your national security doesn't exactly get stronger by leaving traitors alone.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 38 points 3 months ago

Convicted felon and Jan. 6 conspirator Mike Flynn?

Unregistered foreign agent Mike Flynn?

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Shithead maga bleeding a nonprofit dry example aside, this is a good (albeit extreme) illustration of why I'm generally hesitant to give to any large charity.

You can pull their tax returns up online (form 990) and see where the money goes. Too often, it all goes to executive salaries and marketing with some token single digit percentage going to actual charitable work that may or may not be doing any actual good.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

That system needs major reform. You want tax exemptions? Then the lowest paid employee needs to earn 1/15th of the highest paid employee and the median salary needs to be 1/10th of the highest paid.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I gave up arguing he should be ercalled to service, court martialed, stripped of rank and benefits.

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
182 points (99.5% liked)

politics

18933 readers
2730 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS