this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
110 points (98.2% liked)

Ukraine

10382 readers
306 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't see humans in Electronic Ground-To-Air defense much longer: Extremely boring task, extreme quick reaction against a cheap, very small and quiet-ish three-dimensionally moving target required...

[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I assume not -- and I'd go further, say that the same is true of point defense in general, electronic or not -- but until we have an automated turret or turreted vehicle designed, manufactured at scale, and deployed, not a lot of alternatives.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Definitely, the main advantage is this would be a very easy task to teach a human to do, very difficult for a computer.