this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
287 points (97.7% liked)

News

36354 readers
2517 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If they wanted to let a rich person walk free they could have simply refused to prosecute

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That would be make the prosecutor look very bad in such high profile case.

"Technical fumble" allows them to save face.

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Technical fumbles hurt them professionally a lot more. This was a pretty bad fuck up.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Well then it must have really been worth it then.

I am not saying this case is one way or the other but y'all acting like it is definitely not corruption when statistical analysis indicates that wealthy perps get away with murder.

At some point, people start to notice.

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure. But also it's the states job to prove a guilty verdict. And personally if they're gonna pull this crap I'm happy the case got dismissed.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run -2 points 2 years ago

But also it's the states job to prove a guilty verdict.

The state clearly "tried"

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

It makes perfect sense if you don’t think about it

[–] Zess@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The prosecutor mishandled critical evidence which makes her look like a fucking idiot at best and corrupt at worst. There's no saving face here.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Alec walks is all that matters tho!

Remember that guy that did epstein settlement in FL? His career went pretty well until he got caught with bunker bitch nomination and it came out that he knew the facts and still settled.

[–] Zess@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Very likely that the armorer will have her conviction overturned because of the same errors.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run -1 points 2 years ago

I still think she fucked up, I am not going to change my mind on technically for either of them tho.

Him being "an owner" and creating a culture where it happened in my opinion needs to be called out. This whole blame the intern bullshit is getting tiring.

Owner is always "dindu nuffin mate" tho

At the end of the day we sill have a dead person and state resources wasted, just losing all around.