485

“Immensely disappointing”: Nike killing app for $350 self-tying sneakers (arstechnica.com)

submitted 3 months ago by flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

125 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It is hard to imagine that there was not someone inside of Nike that lost their faith in humanity when the pitch for these things was originally taking off.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 42 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A Roku stick requires the Roku streaming service to be functioning to be useful. If there wasn't a service with streaming media, the stick would have nothing to stream.

Still becomes e-waste if Roku drops support for it. Granted, that's not the best example as I've got an old-ass Roku that still works, but the point stands. Same goes for Fire sticks and other devices like that.

They really should be forced to, at minimum, release unlocking tools to allow 3rd party firmware. (Think flashing OpenWRT to a Roku and using it as a travel router or something). Ideally, they'd also release a development kit to foster "after-life" uses of such devices.

Lots of companies will accept old devices back (supposedly to recycle), but there's another "R", re-use, that's also an important part of the process.

[-] DigDoug@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Still becomes e-waste if Roku drops support for it. Granted, that’s not the best example as I’ve got an old-ass Roku that still works, but the point stands. Same goes for Fire sticks and other devices like that.

Just look at Spotify's Car Thing.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 8 points 3 months ago

Thank you, lol. I knew there was a very recent example but was blanking on it.

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

There are other risks, such as the functionality changing without your knowledge or input (see again: Roku): https://www.theverge.com/24188282/roku-tv-update-motion-smoothing-turn-off

[-] austinfloyd@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 months ago

Are kids still even taught the three Rs (reduce, reuse, recycle)? I was always taught that they were listed in order of importance, but that seems to conflict with modern capitalism.

[-] DigDoug@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Apart from their use in the slogan, I don't remember any importance being placed on reduce or reuse when I was at school. I guess "recycle" is the only one compatible with continually buying more shit we don't need.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 1 points 3 months ago

Honestly, no idea. But yeah, the latter two seem in direct opposition to the line always going up at all costs.

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024

485 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59081 readers

2998 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS