That's because driving a car or operating heavy equipment are not a constitutional right written down by decree of democratically elected officials during a constitutional convention, you silly fuck.

Regardless, your lack of broadly socially-accepted individual-level firearms training and neutered militaries will be unable to stop the unending meat waves of aggressive territory-hungry Russian rapists no matter how you play it.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why can’t a civil discourse be had without name calling?

[–] ExFed@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they're either a troll or wildly ignorant. Either way, it's probably safe to just ignore them.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm actually very dumb and ignorant. Apologies.

However, civil discourse can be done with vulgarity. Just stop being a pearl-clutching limp-wrist self-censoring sycophant.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Limp-wrist? So gay right? That's where that term comes from, isnt it? So explain to me how, where someone likes to stick their dick has to do with their opinion of firearms?

[–] ExFed@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

There's a "block user" feature in Lemmy. It's useful in situations like these. Some people never learn the limits of vulgarity.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

We write on a piece of paper that this tool requires no piece of paper because this other piece of paper says it doesn’t need a piece of paper

USE. ACTUAL. REASONS.