96

When asked about Hind’s killing, the U.S. said that, according to Israel, the Palestine Red Crescent Society and U.N. have not helped investigate.

The Israeli military never contacted the Palestine Red Crescent Society about Israel’s killing of a 6-year-old Palestinian girl, her family members, and the paramedics sent to save her, a Red Crescent spokesperson told The Intercept, refuting the State Department’s first substantive remarks about the killing that took place 148 days ago.

“Since the attack at our ambulances that was dispatched to save Hind Rajab, there has been no investigations made by the Israelis or any contact from the Israelis to the Red Crescent,” said spokesperson Nebal Farsakh. “We as the Palestinian Red Crescent have not received any kind of communication from the Israeli military.”

“All I can tell you is what they’ve told us. And what they have said is, they went to the U.N. and the Palestinian Red Crescent and asked them to supply information that would help them, and what they claim is that they were given none,” Miller said.

His comments came on the heels of an independent investigation by the U.K.-based firm Forensic Architecture, which concluded that Israeli fire was most likely responsible for the attack, and that it was “not plausible” that Israeli forces would not have seen who they shot 335 bullets at.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] reddwarf@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

You are so, so wrong here. These children are not hamas, yet you equate them nonetheless. Notice how I did not take a side other then the children's side. And yet, you argue.

This tells me all I need to know, I have seen your stance already. Not because I want to see something, it's your arguing the matter that tells all I need to know.

"Oh also one other thing - you’re fine with mass murder and carnage, as long as it’s against Israelis. That’s what you’re saying when you don’t say Hamas should surrender." And there it is, took you long enough. None said any such thing, you are making this up and you know it. Next up: calling me an anti-semite...

All I did was argue to not kill children and you argued and keep arguing it is an option, a valid option at that. See, if only hamas surrenders right now then all will be fine. This is a lie, a way to justify the killing of children. Well, you argue this point while you know the little children have no say in this at all. So instead of making the correct moral decision to not kill children, Israel chooses to do so anyway, knowing fully well that the kids have no say in the matter.

You keep being despicable and it just gets worse with each post.

It's OK to hold Israel to account for killing innocent people, it is OK to ask Israel to stop bombing little kids. You will not loose anything of value of you are opposed on these stances. Be good, take the moral path. This is a softball position to hold and yet...you fail at it.

[-] teodor_from_achewood@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Does Hamas want the killing to stop?

[-] reddwarf@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

Does it matter, at all?

See, you still want to couple hamas and the allowance to kill children. I purposefully decoupled them because I know what will happen, bizarre discussions where "he said she said" will be abound.

No, there is no story or excuse to kill children. It is that simple. I am at a loss that this is not understood or agreed upon.

[-] teodor_from_achewood@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Does Hamas want the violence to stop?

[-] reddwarf@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

Are the children hamas? Do they have a say in this?

Insane that you keep pushing the hamas narative where these kids have no blame or influence over them being bombed. Yet you keep equating the existence or actions of of hamas with it being OK to kill little kids.

[-] teodor_from_achewood@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Oh so if Hamas doesn't want kids to be bombed why didn't Hamas ever build bomb shelters?

[-] reddwarf@feddit.nl 0 points 4 months ago

Wow, are you really this thick or are you putting on a show?

Read carefully, you have been told this before but it doesn't register it seems:

hamas is irrelevant to the position of israel killing kids.

Israel killing kids is solely and purely the responsibility of Israel the moment they pull the trigger or drop bombs on them.

Why is it so so so difficult for you to understand this simple statement: you do not bomb your way through kids to get at your target.

You know, this insistent clowning around this morally simple topic of you is starting to make me think you are a troll Denying reality and relishing in the pain and hurt of others. Little kids in this case seems to be your...niche? Or is it a fetish? Either way, something is really wrong with you.

FYI, I will now block you as I have no interest debating or discussing with people who find justice and reason in infanticide.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
96 points (93.6% liked)

politics

19102 readers
3526 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS