this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
518 points (99.2% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historyphotos@piefed.social

7672 readers
1 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyphotos@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Black and white photography was cheaper than color all the way into the 90s. It was widely used.

[–] chrizzowski@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

And still is. I shoot a fair bit of black and white film. It's cheaper, I can develop it at home, it produces a silver negative that will last centuries. The medium itself had been around for a century, so it imparts a sense of timelessness. I appreciate a good photo that you can't tell if it's 1924 or 2024 until you notice some dude with a cellphone in the background.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's true and still quite possibly why this photo is black and white, though regardless, that's a trend I don't care for.

I realize I'm probably in a gray area, no pun intended, but I just think it's used as a tactic to make certain past events feel longer ago in an attempt to make it seem like a different time with problems that no longer affect us.

I guess I was just briefly triggered and realize it doesn't really apply here.