this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
49 points (81.0% liked)

Socialism

5194 readers
59 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social 16 points 5 months ago (51 children)

@NoiseColor @yogthos

1/2 [Communist revolutions can be bloody and can lead to authoritarian states.]

– Yes, revolutions can be bloody, whether they're communist or otherwise. That's not really unique of communist revolutions.

"Authoritarian state" is a meaningless redundancy; there's no such thing as a non-authoritarian state. If your criticism is that the revolutions didn't immediately result in a communist society, then that's also a poor criticism since they were never meant to...

[–] Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social 9 points 5 months ago (50 children)

@NoiseColor @yogthos

...immediately transition to communism because that would be impossible, or at least strategically impractical. The plan of Marxist-Leninist revolutions was always to create a transitional state that would eventually transition into a stateless classless society once the state was no longer needed.

[–] jeremy_list@hachyderm.io -2 points 5 months ago (19 children)

@Radical_EgoCom @NoiseColor @yogthos immediate transition is not only possible in theory but actually has some precedent (although so far it's only happened in the wrong place and time to last at scale for more than a few years). On the other hand expecting a transitional state to actually continue the transition is even less rational than expecting Jesus to show up and start helping.

[–] Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@jeremy_list @NoiseColor @yogthos

[immediate transition is not only possible in theory but actually has some precedent]

– How is it possible in theory, and what precedent does it have?

[expecting a transitional state to actually continue the transition is even less rational than expecting Jesus to show up and start helping]

Why?

[–] jeremy_list@hachyderm.io -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@Radical_EgoCom @NoiseColor @yogthos Rosa Luxemburg explained all this better than I could and she wasn't even an anarchist (but really take your pick of almost any non-ML communist theorist).
But in summary: implementing communism inherently deprives counterrevolution of the capital it needs to function, so any delay in implementing communism is at best a strategic error and at worst an indication that the org has already become counterrevolutionary.

[–] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

implementing communism inherently deprives counterrevolution of the capital

How do you want to achieve this? Globally at once? Or bit by bit? Can you please Rosas work?

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)