49
submitted 5 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/socialism@lemmy.ml

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] recently_Coco@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 5 months ago

So many examples of this.

US absolutely torches any progress made in alternative fuels then goes on to claim no possible alternatives to fossil fuels.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 5 months ago

There's a law requiring ever-increasing amounts of biofuel to be mixed into everything. Biofuel has a ton of downsides that have great potential for a dust bowl 2.0, but that's another topic. US researchers have every motivation to develop non-constly alternatives by virtue of investors, even if the investment only gives them a small bubble like Arcimoto's minicars did. In fact, California is considering using hydrogen cars for parts of their network that don't go past the speeds hydrogen fuel can support.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
49 points (81.0% liked)

Socialism

5194 readers
59 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS