this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
49 points (81.0% liked)

Socialism

6452 readers
72 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oops, yeah, I forgot about that. But you actually see livestreamed debate about whether suppressing these protests was good (oftentimes it's highly criticized), and you don't just get prosecuted if you just express opinions online. Also, the campus protests were suppressed because the owners of the private property being protested on didn't like it. They get substantial funding from the state, but there's still a difference from the state itself doing it. Like socialists and flat-earthers don't get straight-up stamped out by police, whereas Stalin actively prosecuted people who didn't support pseudobiology.

[–] Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@Aatube @yogthos @NoiseColor

I'm not at all trying to suggest that Stalinist Russia was more free than modern-day America, just that many people think of America as a free country when it's actually closer to Stalinist Russia than they'd care to recognize.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

My point is that the United States is indeed much less authoritarian. Saying that there's no such thing as a state that's more authoritarian or less authoritarian is denying reality.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

US incarceration rate is higher than what USSR had during Stalin's purges. It's hard to think of a better measure of how authoritarian a state is than the percentage of the population it keeps behind bars.

[–] Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@Aatube @yogthos @NoiseColor

[Saying that there's no such thing as a state that's more authoritarian or less authoritarian is denying reality.]

To clarify, that's not what I said. I said that there is no such thing as a non-authoritarian state because states are authoritarian by nature, not that there aren't varying degrees of the level of authoritarianism among different states. America is in many ways less authoritarian than the USSR, but it's still authoritarian nonetheless.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 2 years ago

Hmm, I understand what you meant to say now. However, by all common discourse and even the term's very original definition, the United States isn't "authoritarian" enough to be considered authoritarian.