this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
997 points (97.8% liked)

memes

18231 readers
3856 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That certainly doesn't look steady, lol. Large investment firms and banks are buying up a large number of single family housing, making it unaffordable.

Wages do go up, yes, with respect to inflation. They get nowhere close to productivity increases, as exploitation rises.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Look at the scale, it's between 63-68 for decades and the top number was literally a bubble

I agree that not all of the productivity gains go to the workers, but the workers are better off now than before

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am referring to the literal times we live in. Single-family housing units are being gobbled up by large firms, this will not show up on your graph just yet.

The Workers are now recieving even less of the Value they create than before, that's a wild way to justify this.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Corporations owning houses is a tiny percentage, again, home ownership rate is 60%+

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is not a tiny percentage, and it is getting worse.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not even a special problem if a corp is a landlord or just one person.

The problem is not enough housing, not enough construction. Housing prices are actually decreasing in Austin because Texas builds

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Landlords are problems themselves, it doesn't matter if it's a corp or a person.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The problem is NIMBYs, not landlords

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why? It's impossible for all of the homes to be owned, we've been between 63-68% home ownership

In fact, a nasty thing happened when the home ownership peaked around 2008

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Public and individual ownership. Renting for profit is predatory.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not everyone can just pay a down payment on a property

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Public and individual ownership.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The government doesn't have the money to buy every property

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Is that what I am advocating for?