318
submitted 5 months ago by NataliePortland@lemmy.ca to c/til@lemmy.world

The weight of the trees was so great that the ones on the bottom got squished and became coal. That’s where coal is from. Bonus fact: the whole time this was happening, sharks were hunting in the oceans. Sharks are older than trees and fungus!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

if trees survived their self-inflected apocalypse, why can’t we?

[-] venoft@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Oh humans will survive, no problem. I mean, not a lot of them and not happily, and there will probably be a nuclear war at the end there, but humans won't go extinct. We're too smart to not find a nice hole to hide in.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 5 months ago

Millions is fine. Its a lot. Billions is just crazy and never should have happened.

[-] oo1@kbin.social 9 points 5 months ago

Trees breed by putting their babies into extremely resilient, heat and cold protected stasis pods that can go centuries without care and attention in the right conditions - like suviving an ice age or forest fire.

Human babies are wimps by comparison - most of them would die after only a few days left outside at 0 degrees C.

Humans probably will survive too - but how many?
Elon + all this 3 mates.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, I freeze my spurm and I'm pretty sure there's a few thousand different women on this continent who have frozen eggs

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They didn't know what they were doing, we do, and we actively choose to keep doing it. Unlike those trees mindlessly performing a base biological imperative, we possess the capacity to stop and simply don't because we'd lose some of the comfort and convenience our destructive tech provides.

We're cruel to this planet, all the other creatures on it, and one another. So my reverse ask is, why do you want us to survive? Just because ra-ra home team? Because billions subsisting to serve the whims and ego of a few thousand of our worst, most broken, greedy sociopaths in perpetuity is somehow meaningful? Genuinely asking.

[-] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

I don’t understand why you believe there is a difference between choosing to continue destroying the world and just “destroying the world”

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The difference is intent, which matters to me.

I wouldn't equate a meteor that struck Germany killing millions to Adolf Hitler killing millions because there's no reason to hate the meteor. It did nothing wrong because it had no agency or sapience, you might as well be mad at physical reality. Its a tragedy, but no one did it, causality set that meteor on our path from some random collision millions of years ago, and it just happened.

Your comment is akin to not seeing a difference between someone who drops dead from some internal reason like a heart attack or brain aneurism, and someone who was shot in the head. After all, who cares how, that person is dead, what's the difference, amirite?

[-] ech@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

But their question wasn't "Do humans deserve to go extinct?", it was "Can we survive?" Your (valid) issues with human-driven climate change don't really have anything to do with what they brought up.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Completely fair and correct criticism. I mistook their how query as a why query. I was wrong.

[-] crawancon@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

lol@we know what we're doing

ho boy

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Just because wealthy business interests have spent a century pointing and laughing at the scientists warning us of what were doing to our only habitat(with our obedient consent because "jerb creators"), doesn't mean we have ignorance as an excuse. Pretending the science was wrong out of convenience still means we knew and are responsible.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure people are gonna keep fucking regardless of if they do it mindfully.

[-] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Saying "trees" is like saying "mammals."

Those trees from back then were different species of trees.

So, sure, mammals will survive, just like they survived the asteroid impact that killed the dinosaurs. But we humans were not those mammals. And we won't be the mammals that survive our self-inflicted apocalypse.

We will be long gone.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
318 points (96.2% liked)

Today I Learned

17786 readers
1 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS