this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
255 points (96.7% liked)

World News

50971 readers
2318 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The insect glue, produced from edible oils, was inspired by plants such as sundews that use the strategy to capture their prey. A key advantage of physical pesticides over toxic pesticides is that pests are highly unlikely to evolve resistance, as this would require them to develop much larger and stronger bodies, while bigger beneficial insects, like bees, are not trapped by the drops.

The drops were tested on the western flower thrip, which are known to attack more than 500 species of vegetable, fruit and ornamental crops. More than 60% of the thrips were captured within the two days of the test, and the drops remained sticky for weeks.

Work on the sticky pesticide is continuing, but Dr Thomas Kodger at Wageningen University & Research, in the Netherlands, who is part of the self defence project doing the work, said: “We hope it will have not nearly as disastrous side-effects on the local environment or on accidental poisonings of humans. And the alternatives are much worse, which are potential starvation due to crop loss or the overuse of chemical pesticides, which are a known hazard.”

Link to the study

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bratosch@lemm.ee 68 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A key advantage of physical pesticides over toxic pesticides is that pests are highly unlikely to evolve resistance, as this would require them to develop much larger and stronger bodies.

Goddammit, stop playing with fire, scientists!!

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)

In the Jurassic period there were giant insects like dragonflies with 4ft wingspan. Turns out THIS is how we get to Jurassic park

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Carboniferous period. Jurassic was about 100m years later.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Shit was fire (30% atmospheric oxygen levels)

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

35%, even. It's more like 20% today, for comparison.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Let's make s movie!

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It was a wild guess and I was hoping someone smarter than me would correct me ❤️

In my defense the dinosaurs from Jurassic Park came from wildly different eras so Carboniferous super bugs can still fit in!

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

I just asked ChatGPT because I knew something was off.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago

Insect body size is dictated by oxygen levels, and since they absorb oxygen through their skin if they get too large with too little oxygen they suffocate.

[–] bratosch@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah and human-sized scorpions

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

You are thinking of sea scorpions who for one werent scorpions and for two were aquatic in nature only going onto the pre carboniferous land as a shortcut since there was nothing on land.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not unless the level of oxygen in the air goes up dramatically, that's what allowed those big bodies when they had no lungs

[–] Haagel@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Isn't that Lamarckism? If I recall correctly, that's an older model of evolution that is not commonly recognized anymore.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

slightly stronger ones survive to pass their genes to their offspring, that's the idea.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago

Natural selection is usually implied. So, in long form, smaller insects would have to be less reproductively successful, and that's hard when you're a pest that really benefits from being tiny, stealthy and energy-economical.