207

This battery lasts the life of the router under the operating environmental conditions specified for the router, and is not field-replaceable.

But who determines its lifespan?

Knowing there is a battery set to fail and I can't simply replace it makes me physically uncomfortable. Enough so that I'd rather it not have RTC.

Thanks Cisco.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

If you know this much then replacing the battery with a battery holder should be simple.

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I was just going there... Couple solders to the existing connections and you're in business. Total cost? 4 dollars for equipment and a bit of time.

[-] ZeldaFreak@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Its not about knowing everything. You can know a lot but don't have the skills. Cisco doesn't make cheap products and screwing it up, it not good. Especially it can be easily done at the factory. Its not like it would cost them much more. I can get a holder for like 0.50 to 1€ per piece. There you must subtract 19% VAT and think in bigger quantities. On a per device basis, its not adding much.

They do this, because it adds up and they can save a lot of money. They make more money when a customer pays for a replacement or when a customer screw things up and needs to buy a new device. Its not something companies should be allowed to do. Also it would be even better if we don't need to tell companies what they should do and they do it themselves. In fact a lot do this, because it doesn't add much to the total cost of one device, but it makes the product better.

this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
207 points (98.1% liked)

AssholeDesign

6782 readers
3 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS