this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
118 points (95.4% liked)

PCGaming

6507 readers
4 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As if EA didn't already make bland, derivative games...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] moriquende@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Somewhat is key. You can try to guide it in a direction, but that's it. Also, as a player, you can never be sure if the dialogue is meaningful or not. Does it reveal something about the plot? Is it a key information about the character? Is it just hallucinated gibberish to fill the space?

[โ€“] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Besides, LLMs struggle with retaining contextual information for long and they're pretty dang resource hungry. Expect a game with LLM-driven dialogue to reserve several gigs of VRAM and a fair chunk of GPU processing power solely for that.

And then you still get characters who hallucinate plot points or suddenly speak gibberish.