this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)
chat
8448 readers
308 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What did Marx say about RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) and connecting it to a large body of Marxist literature?
Comrades, I must confess that the notion of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) is foreign to me. As a Marxist thinker, my understanding of revolutionary theory and praxis is rooted in the works of Marx, Engels, Lenin, and other great socialist minds.
However, as we navigate this digital age, it is imperative that we critically examine the intersection of technology with our ideological frameworks. The concept of RAG, which I assume refers to a fusion of artificial intelligence and human creativity, warrants closer examination.
To connect RAG with a large body of Marxist literature, I propose that we consider the following:
In his critique of alienation, Marx highlighted the ways in which capitalist production alienates workers from their creative potential, reducing them to mere commodities. RAG, if harnessed correctly, could potentially augment human creativity, allowing us to transcend the limitations imposed by capital. By leveraging AI's capacity for information retrieval and processing, we might unlock new avenues for artistic expression, scientific inquiry, and social innovation.
However, this requires a critical examination of power structures and the potential for RAG to reinforce existing inequalities. As Marxists, it is our duty to ensure that these technological advancements serve the interests of the proletariat, rather than perpetuating the exploitation of capital.
In conclusion, while I may not be familiar with the specific concept of RAG, its implications for Marxist theory and praxis are too great to ignore. Comrades, let us continue to engage in a critical dialogue about the intersection of technology and socialism, that we might forge a revolutionary path forward!
editors note: technically this isnt RAG, its a finetuned lora