this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
461 points (96.8% liked)
linuxmemes
21282 readers
284 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
- These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudo in Windows.
- No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
Â
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I understand wanting to use this, but, fingerprint reader is so I secure I usually avoid it.
Is it really less secure than a password? How so?
If it's compromised you can't change it for one
Also you can't be legally forced without a warrant to give a password but biometric data you can be legally forced without a warrant to give up
Lol let's take the kid gloves off, shall we?
Fingerprints, as a means of authentication, is just straight up not secure.
Man, I knew fingerprint encryption was bad but that is nuts.
Fwiw they’re able to do the same thing by the sound of someone typing a password across the room. Not advocating for fingerprints or anything, just these exotic hacks are everywhere
...my memory was that this only worked after the routine had been trained on your typing idiosyncrasies
The thing is, one of those attacks requires you to type your password. The other requires you to touch something.
This one's my fav
With a password you can have an exact binary comparison. Either you supplied the correct password or you didn't.
But with biometrics you just have an approximation because your fingerprints change slightly due to the position in which you hold them, your health, humidity, pressure and probably other stuff I'm not thinking of. So the sensor can only say that it's like 95 % or whatever sure that it got the correct fingerprint. And this uncertainty makes it much easier to exploit.
And your fingerprint is not secret. You leave it all over the place. Especially on devices you use every day. And your fingerprint can (and will) be taken without your consent. And you cannot change your fingerprint if it gets compromised.
All those spy movies showing how trivial it is to circumvent biometric security have in common that whatever method they used was realistic.
Lol my hands are jacked from physical labor and health, scars on my fingers, dry skin, my thumb print only works only 50% of the time anyhow.
A fingerprint is a password you leave a copy of on everything you touch.
Biometric data can be used as login but is unsuitable as password, since it can't be changed once compromised.
I use it if only because my wife won't use passwords on her devices. We aren't even at step one for device security. I'll take what I can get, or what she's willing to work with.
Can you get to 2FA with a 4 digit PIN, at least?