this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
48 points (91.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40298 readers
1135 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
48
Reverse proxy (self.selfhosted)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by mfat to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

I have an openwrt router at home which also acts as my home server. It's running a bunch of services using docker (Jellyfin, Nextcloud, etc.)

I have set up an SSH tunnel between my openwrt router and VPS and can access jellyfin successfully.

I understand that I need to set up a reverse proxy to access multiple services and have https.

But I'm confused if I should set up this reverse proxy on the VPS or on the router itself. Is nginx the easiest option? Should i add subdomains in cloudflare for every service?

Pease don't recommend vpns since they are all blocked where i live (wireguard, tailscale openVPN, etc.) I'm limited to using ssh tunneling only.

Thanks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are pros and cons to keeping the proxy on the VPS or at home.

If you keep it at home you will have end-to-end encryption from the browser to your home server. Downside, you will not get the IP of the remote client, just the IP of the router, so you won't be able to do IP blocking or diagnostics.

By putting the proxy on the VPS and decrypting HTTPS there you can add remote IPs to connections but you have to keep the TLS certificate on the VPS so in theory someone could mess with it.

A third option is to run a minimal passthrough proxy on the VPS that adds the remote IP to the HTTPS connections without decrypting them. To do this you must use the same proxy at both ends (home and VPS) and both must have the PROXY protocol enabled.

I would suggest doing just proxy at home to start with because it's simpler. If you want a GUI use NPM (Nginx Proxy Manager) it's super easy. If you prefer a proxy where you write config by hand use Caddy.

After you have it working at home you can consider adding the one on VPS and enabling the PROXY protocol. Although I'm not 100% sure Caddy supports it, look into it. You may have to use Nginx in both places I'd it doesn't.

You do not need to add subdomains in DNS, not unless you want to. You just need one domain to point an A/AAAA record at the VPS public IP, then you can make the subdomains a wildcard CNAME pointing at the base domain. So A/AAAA example.com -> IP, and CNAME *.example.com -> example.com. Or you can put the A in another domain and point the CNAME at that.

When requesting TLS certificates it's the same thing, you never ask for explicit certificates for each subdomain, you just ask for one wildcard certificate for *.example.com. Aside from the obvious benefit of not having to add and remove certificates every time you add or remove subdomains, there's the not obvious benefit of not having bots learn about your subdomains (certificate application are public records).

The subdomains do not need to resolve in DNS for this to work, the certbot verifies that you own the domain by using a DNS API key to create a temporary TXT on example.com; as long as that works it won't care what's actually defined in there.

[–] mfat 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Thanks for the detailed reply. But I'm still confused. Do I need a separate ssh tunnel for every single service I run on my local server?

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago

No, that's the magic of the reverse proxy. You can transport all HTTP services through just one port. It will route them to the correct service on your service based on the domain (which is passed through the HTTP headers).

It won't work for non-HTTP services, for those you'll have to make a separate ssh tunnel per port.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

The reverse proxy is going to have a config that says "for hostname 'foo' I should forward traffic to foo.example.com:port".

If you setup the rproxy at home then ssh just needs to forward all port 443 traffic to the rproxy. It doesn't care about hostnames. The rproxy will then get a request with the hostname in the data and forward it to the appropriate target on behalf of the requester.

If you setup the rproxy at the vps then yes - you would need to forward different ports to each backend target. This is because the rproxy would need to direct traffic to each target individually. And if your target is "localhost" (because that's where the ssh endpoint is) then you would differentiate each backend by port.