this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
38 points (89.6% liked)

World News

3012 readers
118 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's not too bad for interceptors. Much more believable than the previous figures

[โ€“] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hitting a very fast missile is not easy!

[โ€“] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

True, but if you take the cost of the inteceptors into consideration and compare it to the cost of the missles and drones, then you go from "not to bad" to "another of these and we're out of money".

[โ€“] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do the interceptors cost that much more than missiles?

[โ€“] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Vastly more, yes.

was it ballistic missiles that they were shooting down?