110
Removed by mod (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by SolomonG@sh.itjust.works to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hector_McG@programming.dev 18 points 4 months ago

You have it the wrong way round; humans invented god.

[-] MadBob@feddit.nl 10 points 4 months ago

Can you not just leave it out for a bit? It's irritating now.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is Lemmy. You cannot go 5 posts without someone acting like a 2007 edgy internet atheist. I assume this is where they all ended up.

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

It's edgy for someone to be atheist?

[-] MadBob@feddit.nl 7 points 4 months ago

I thought we'd snuffed this shite-arse logic out with "toxic masculinity"? They said "acting like a 2007 edgy internet atheist", not "being atheist, which makes them edgy".

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee -5 points 4 months ago

Literally all they did was suggest the opposite scenario. What exactly is edgy about it? It's the atheism being taken issue with clearly, there's no internet edgy about it. If that is edgy, then it basically says "anyone who disagrees with me is 2007 internet edgy."

[-] MadBob@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago

I don't know, ask them yourself?

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee -3 points 4 months ago

If billions of people believed Santa Claus existed, and forced their beliefs on other people, wouldn't you get sick of it?

Religion has killed many millions of people, standing up and calling it out for it's lies and nonsense is the right thing to do.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 6 points 4 months ago

Christianity hasn't killed people. People who would have killed people anyway taking parts of Christian scripture out of context has killed people. By that logic, scientific studies have killed people due to eugenics. Should that mean that we should ban the study of science or even genetics? Absolutely not!

What do you categorise as "forcing their beliefs on other people"?

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee -3 points 4 months ago

I wonder what the hundreds of thousands burned alive for not being Christian would say to your comment.

[-] MadBob@feddit.nl 8 points 4 months ago

See, I could reply to this with "nothing, because there's no afterlife". That's what's irritating: taking figures of speech or offhand comments based on this old idea of God and opting to be a humourless little twerp about them.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago

Where does the Bible say to burn people alive for not being Christian?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

'one of these days, boris, we're going to look into our microsocopes and find ourselves staring into gods eyes and the first one who blinks is going to lose his testicles'

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 4 months ago
[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

import god

It's just a namespace

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
110 points (78.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

29172 readers
211 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS