843
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

You keep talking about every vote not mattering in a vote that was won by 200-some-odd people with over 3000 write-ins. That person who can make a measurable impact wouldn't have been in the position to do anything if just a few hundred more people had believed it was hopeless and just stayed home. So how do you justify that with your beliefs?

I get that the presidential election is broken on many levels, and many people's votes have little or no bearing on the final outcome, or that any likely outcome will even be ideal, but the implausible has happened before, depending on how people vote.

The one thing that has never improved the outcome is to shrug your shoulders and do nothing.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

If one person would have stayed home they would have won by 199 votes instead of 200. It would have taken 200 people staying home for it to be a tie. An individual vote only matters if the margin is one vote.

And the neat part is that even with that victory the other branches of government can mean that even this 200 vote victory doesn't do anything. Whose to say the state legislature doesn't impeach him for not doing his job and enforcing the law? Whose to say localities don't take it upon themselves to follow the law and arrest women getting abortions? Not only does one vote not really do anything, there's all kinds of checks built into the government to prevent action.

My point isn't that people should sit at home and do nothing, it's that they should be realistic in their expectations of voting being a way to take action. Yes, it's nice that in this one instance one guy is doing the right thing. The rest of the government will put a stop to that soon I'm sure.

If you want to really take action, create a list of demands and start vandalizing expensive things until they're met.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

Ah yes. Every drop thinks it's not to blame for the flood.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Tell me you didn't read the entire post without telling me you didn't read the entire post.

I've seen my very important and influential vote made meaningless by other parts of our government too many times to think it really helps. But I'm allowed to complain about that because I voted so that's nice.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

I did read the post, but I really stopped caring when you said, to paraphrase, "I love democracy, but why can't we do what I want, regardless of what other people want." Yes, one vote matters very little. No, democracy doesn't always mean you get what you want. Yes, democracy depends on large groups of people actually putting in the effort to get their wishes heard. Yes, violent revolution is an option to achieve change, but adults prefer that as a last resort since violence often leads to death. As the old saw goes, soap box, ballot box, jury box, ammo box. You seem to have a great fondness for the first and the last, a grudging willingness to use the second, and a complete lack of awareness of the third.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Okay so you read it but you didn't understand it. Gotcha.

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
843 points (95.7% liked)

People Twitter

5383 readers
827 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS