360
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] terminhell@lemmy.world 137 points 5 months ago

NGL, I can respect that. Probably on tax money let's be honest, but kudos for wanting to be informed.

[-] Icalasari@fedia.io 137 points 5 months ago

Honestly, I'd much rather tax money go to that than to hand outs for corporations

[-] terminhell@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

Ya, thinking about it now, I'm on board.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 79 points 5 months ago

I’d GLADY use my tax dollars to educate my representatives about new technology.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

To be fair though, someone in that position of power should already be well educated. It should be a requirement so we don't end up with the space lasers dipshit and the handy in a theater whore. It should also be a requirement to keep up with times by doing what this guy did.

It takes more checks and balances to be a truck driver than it does to become a senator or someone in the house.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Yeah but he got free classes while the rest of us suffered. Like to know how he vote on student loan debt.

[-] Lemmeenym@lemm.ee 72 points 5 months ago

https://www.billtrack50.com/legislatordetail/20814

That's his record of votes and proposed legislation for the current Congress.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2034

That's a bill he supported in committee.

He has also worked with Sanders and Warren to convince Biden to expand debt relief granted through the executive branch. As far as congressmen go, he's a good one.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

Glad to hear it. Reading article he seems to want to truly understand the billls he is voting for or against. Good to see but wish we could get fresh blood in there. Because Sanders and this guy won't live forever. On another note fuck Warren she a 🐍.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

She stabed Sanders in the back and she refused to leave the primary during Super Tuesday all because she was promised VP. She literally flushed all the work progressive tried to accomplish for her career.

No surprise since she was a former Republican even 2016 she refused to endorse Sanders over Clinton.

She not progressive she a neoliberal and wish people stop talking about her as if she on our side because she is not. She a snake in the grass. She there to seam progressive but to toe the corporate line.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

His salary is also from taxes so kinda either way.

If we're going to PAY for congressmen, the least we could do is make it free for everyone else.

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
360 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18992 readers
2885 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS