this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
56 points (96.7% liked)
Privacy
32015 readers
1090 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes they are allowed. The devs have nothing against third party clients as long as they're not abusing the network or pretending to be the official Signal app.
The issue you're referring to happened, I believe, around 2016 and it was specific to one developer who was using a similar app name and the lead Signal dev basically told them specifically to not use their network.
Almost every other Signal client since then even report to Signal's servers as a third party client - and the signal devs can see this in their logs - and nobody has been kicked/asked to stop anything since.
I also seem to recall the issue may have been 3rd party clients unintentionally abusing the network at the time, causing issues for other users, so I can see the frustration from a dev perspective to potentially be woken up at midnight for an issue/outage affecting your users, that is caused or at least made worse by clients that are pegging their servers.
If anyone has more background or corrections, please let me know so I can update/edit my statement.
Not true. There's an issue in the molly repo where Moxie chimed in and told them to stop using their servers.
So, theyre not being banned or sued...but they are not allowed either.
Not that I don't believe you, but do you have a source? I mean, Molly has worked using Signal's servers for at least 5 years now and Signal's devs can see that people are using it and have the capacity to easily block them if they wanted to, so how are they not allowed but still allowed? Seems contradictory.
Just search their repo issues for Moxies username. Should be easy to find.
I tried but my google-fu failed me.
Search in github, not google
I guess he is talking about this
https://github.com/LibreSignal/LibreSignal/issues/37#issuecomment-217231557
read the main page of this repo, the Dev made it clear that moxie made the right move in the end by accepting a gcm free notification feature