Funny

13778 readers

273 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

217

I don't trust Jeff (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

After seeing Russia’s non-nuclear weapons, I honestly don’t believe they have that many nuclear weapons.

I’m not saying they have none, but I don’t think they’ve kept up the maintenance required for 7,000.

[–] mod@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Same goes for the US. Most launch facilities are in subpar condition.

[–] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think that "subpar" are slightly different to US and Russia though.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Yup. It's actually fascinating to read up on how the US maintains and tests nuclear weapons.

load more comments (4 replies)