view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
No such thing. If you still identify as a Republican, you're either a fascist or a fascist-enabler. Neither is a moderate.
This is what you sound like:
Works the other way around too: if you keep calling wolves lambs, people are going to stop believing you too.
You just vote for white supremacists and/or people who actively defend white supremacists and then act like that's a thing psychologically healthy people do.
Cool. So you’re calling me a nazi because of association with people I neither support nor associate with. Wanna know what that does? It convinces me to never associate with you. It also means that when you call anyone else a nazi, I will straight up ignore you. Way to be part of the problem, you are actively enabling nazis by harboring and covering them. Just what I would expect from a standard bigot.
Imagine if you cared half as much about the Nazis in your party as you do about them being called Nazis.
Oh, I absolutely do care which is why I’m ecstatic that this guy got successfully recalled. It’s just bullshit that he got that far and people crying ~~wolf~~ nazi is how he did.
Ah yes, the radical left are the ones keeping you from cleaning your party out.
Tell me: how many Confederate flags is too many for a political rally?
The worst parts of Lemmy show up when one doesn't fall lockstep into whatever flavor of far-left naviete is being pushed down-thread.
I don't agree with everything you posted above but the name calling you were handed in response to an attempt at earnest conversation is an excellent window into the grade school maturity of those very elements.
I used to be more centrist but the left has actively forced me to the right. I grew up in MA and my conservative friends all think I’m liberal. I just personally realize in not left because of people like this. I prefer the party that is kind to me on the street. Being a liberal in Enid is far easier and more comfortable than being a centrist in Seattle. Fascism is a hell of a drug and Seattle loves its drugs.
I grew up in a conservative stronghold and still live adjacent to several of them. Separating ideas from people is a maturing point and one that I hope you and your detractors aspire to.
The attribution in this space is off the charts.
Nope. I specifically said "white supremacist or enabler of white supremacists", which is accurate for every Republican.
While all nazis are white supremacists, not all white supremacists are nazis. Nazism is a specific kind of white supremacist ideology that isn't identical to the brand of white supremacist fascism currently ruling the GOP.
Calling yourself a Republican is as textbook "supporting or associating with" the Republican Party as it gets and the Republican Party is a white supremacist fascist party. Ergo, you're either lying or don't know what the words you're using mean. Probably a bit of both, as is standard for the Trump cult.
Don't threaten me with the lack of an awful time 😄
Well it's not like you paid that close attention the first time around, what with changing what words I used 🙄
Nope, that would be you and the rest of your buddies in the fascist party pretending that you're just "moderate conservatives" that in no way associate with fascists by voting for a fascist party and identifying as being part of a fascist party.
More standard GOP projection 🙄
I just want to say I’m loving your comments ITT. Very well-written and a pleasure to read!
Thanks, I appreciate it! 🫶
So you’re an intolerant extremist that lumps any and everyone that doesn’t agree 100% with you into a broad category that you dehumanize and violently oppose by all means necessary to publicly shame them into compliance. Got it, you’re literally a textbook fascist. Add in your deliberate harboring of white supremacists by purposefully giving them cover to hide.
I don’t associate with radical fascists. Have a good life.
"No u" is always the way Republicans end this conversation, because they can't be bothered to confront the white supremicists in their party.
They exclusively punch left.
Nope, that's the people of theparty you're defending
Still the Republican party.
Nope, that's still the Republican party, who embody ALL of the 14 common features of fascism
Again, still you. Doesn't it hurt your brain to project that much?
Yeah you do. Or were you lying about being a Republican?
What fun churlishness, now let's do you:
Ah yes. It's other people's fault that a person is a Nazi.
What a smart comic!
It's almost as if my point was the laziness of a broad brush and the inability to have a conversation without falling back to antics deserving of the playground.
Well that's not the point of the comic, so that was a massive failure.
Subtext is hard, but I do believe you can learn to find it.
Unfortunately, I have little doubt that you'll continue giving cover to fascists in the name of enlightened centrism.
I’m sorry, the card says “moops.”
Oh no, please don't hit me with your broad brush of righteousness and name calling... Whatever will I do?
Continue to push your false equivalency, obviously.
Every accusation is a confession, no?
So when you said I was self-righteous and calling you names...
...I replied below the name-calling. Clever, right?
Now you only need to identify the purported false equivalency to match suit.
I'm not going to do a little dance for you.
Oh no, how many Nazis did I just make there?!
Exactly, who needs evidence or to actually grapple with the beliefs of others when you can just blithely throw labels about?