Privacy

32179 readers

359 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

146

Why don't people here love SimpleXChat more? (simplex.chat)

submitted 8 months ago by SolarPunker@slrpnk.net to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

SimpleX Chat is an instant messenger that is decentralized and doesn't depend on any unique identifiers such as phone numbers or usernames. Users of SimpleX Chat can scan a QR code or click an invite link to participate in group conversations.

-privacyguides.org

It's clearly proving to be the most innovative technology when it comes to decentralized communication, in my opinion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] uzi@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In F-Droid, after disabling all anti-features, SimpleX still is listed. Signal never will be due to connecting to GCM or Firebase. Molly is an improvement for Signal but not for untrackable privacy like SimpleX from using a different ID with each individual SimpleX contact.

[–] malean@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I hoped Molly leaved the sms feature, that is the only thing I can use as a bait for let my friends switch to signal.

[–] uzi@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, because SMS code was removed from Signal, I believe Molly would have to fork the code if they try to put it back in.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention, SMS was removed because it’s inherently insecure at every level. Keeping it would mean there’d be an insecure side channel into the protocol. While it’s a useful onboarding mechanism, it can also be abused — and was. So eventually it got removed to prefer privacy and security over convenience.

[–] uzi@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

That's a valid reason, prioritizing security over convenience. I forgot about the fact that texting is plain text communication.