770
submitted 7 months ago by Goronmon@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

People did have issues paying for it all together, back when they were called "expansion packs."

I don't mind paying for more of the game. I do mind paying for fixes to a broken game. I don't mind optional cosmetic upgrades, but I don't like pay-to-win, even in single player (looking at you, Nintendo amiibos).

But regardless, people are going to complain, and many of their complaints will be valid.

[-] schmidtster@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

People had different issues with those, that was because online was a portion of it, and people thought devs were holding content back just to make more money. Obviously some did that, but they started painting every dev with that brush and they needed to adjust to save their bottom line from being affected.

Every change has been a reactionary effort to adjust for the market changes and people suddenly not wanting what they just wanted a few years ago, and using it to their marketing advantage. Of course not everyone is going to be happy, it’s just funny that certain devs get defended for doing what everyone else does since their marketing gets eating up.

this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
770 points (97.9% liked)

Games

32588 readers
750 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS