593
submitted 6 months ago by leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

in 2018, Facebook told Vox that it doesn't use private messages for ad targeting. But a few months later, The New York Times, citing "hundreds of pages of Facebook documents," reported that Facebook "gave Netflix and Spotify the ability to read Facebook users’ private messages."

Surprising? No. Appalling? Yes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 6 points 6 months ago
[-] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

No. That doesn't eliminate the need to use a phone number! It's just 'hidden'.

[-] Undertaker@feddit.de 6 points 6 months ago

That's not the point. It was statet that each message is associated with the number. But it isn't. The only way to achieve this in Signal is getting into your phone.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online -4 points 6 months ago

Wow you don't know how to read.

Phone numbers are still required and Signal got a lot of shit for it.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 months ago

Phone numbers are still required

But are they still attached to messages?

this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
593 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

31384 readers
62 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS