Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

11419 readers

1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

No harassment
crossposts from c/Open Source & c/docker & related may be allowed, depending on context
Video Promoting is allowed if is within the topic.
No spamming.
Stay friendly.
Follow the lemmy.ml instance rules.
Tag your post. (Read under)

Important

Beginning of January 1st 2024 this rule WILL be enforced. Posts that are not tagged will be warned and if not fixed within 24h then removed!

Lemmy doesn't have tags yet, so mark it with [Question], [Help], [Project], [Other], [Promoting] or other you may think is appropriate.

Cross-posting

!everything_git@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!docker@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!portainer@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!fediverse@lemmy.ml is allowed if topic has to do with selfhosting.
!selfhosted@lemmy.ml is allowed!

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Zoe8338@lemmy.ml

dogmuffins@lemmy.ml

testman@lemmy.ml

Most promising "self-hosting for the masses" projects? (self.selfhost)

submitted 8 months ago by mfat to c/selfhost@lemmy.ml

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

What are the most promising projects/services aiming at making self hosting easier for everyone?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] marathon@liberdon.com 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

@halm Docker seems like a good idea:After all that what's flatpaks are right? Apps in a docker like space, self contained?

[–] halm@leminal.space 1 points 7 months ago

As far as I understand it, yes. I think Flatpaks are isolated from the wider system but maybe pool dependencies to avoid redundancy, while dockers are fully sandboxed from each other?

I may be wrong, flatpaks were never really my cup of tea.