World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
This may be an unpopular opinion, but cheerleading is ALL about sexualizing young girls and women. Maybe get rid of it altogether.
Edit: Since this proved to be a popular opinion, let me get on my soap box. Not only does cheerleading unnecessarily sexualize girls, it's also the most dangerous sport for female athletes. There's really no reason for it, IMO.
Source
It has always struck me as odd that people surprisedpikachuface.jpg whenever something inherently highly sexual is... checks notes sexualized by spectators.
I'm with you. Either educate, own it, and lean into it, or get rid of it.
It's sexualized, but not sexual. Like beauty pageants.
Usually when kids do a sexualized thing, it's "supposed" to be cute and not sexual. "Haha, kids doing the adult things! Adorable." Or if it takes skill, "wow, so great for a kid. She'll be ready when she tries out as an adult".
But then the creeps come along and sexualize the kids doing a "cute" thing.
And it happens every time. By now, it should be expected; surprising to no one.
It doesn't mean we have to stop those things, unless we decide that we don't want adult cheerleaders or adult beauty pageants. I'm okay with that personally, but I get that it's an important cultural thing for a lot of people.
If we want these things for adults, then we need to let children do them, because cheerleading (in particular) is a sport, and the best adults are often the ones who practiced as children. Same as with sports.
I don't know how we keep those cultural activities and also stop the sexualization. Banning certain outfits or articles of clothing to certain age groups or during certain activities feels wrong, but not quite as wrong as condoning pedophilia...which is what a lot of children's beauty pageants and cheerleading clearly ends up being, even if unintentionally.
Yeah, nothing sexual about those adolescent girls, nothing at all. Christ, was nobody here ever a teenager?
I was generally referring to children, not just minors. There are creeps who love the kinds of beauty pageants that Honey Boo Boo was in as a child.
But yes, you're absolutely right. We should expect that there are going to be some people who are attracted to post-pubescent minors, and there are going to be some creeps among those people who will make everything worse for everyone.
I feel like child beauty pageants are especially disgusting, to be honest. I can't imagine them being anything but harmful to the children participating in them, especially when forced to by parents who just want to feed their own ego.
I definitely agree. I think beauty pageants are pretty disgusting, but child beauty pageants cross several terrible lines for me.
But it's a cultural thing. I'm not an expert, so I don't want to necessarily shame it unless I know that it's inherently harmful to children (and can't be modified to be no more harmful than forcing a kid to join a club they hate).
I mean there is quite a bit of athletics involved, it's not exclusively female, and I don't think it's more sexualized than just...dancing. Also high school and college cheerleading is pretty different than the cheerleading in pro sports.
Sure, but the skirts and skimpy tops are unnecessary. Though, if you de-sexified the outfits i guarantee interest would drop.
-50% cheer & +25% leading
But then how am I going to sexualize them /s
The duality of man. In another post about this news there was someone saying that it's a silly thing to be concerned about. But I agree, it should be discontinued, though at least this makes it somewhat less offensive.