73
submitted 7 months ago by Alsephina@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Archive link

  • Chinese diplomat’s comments at ICJ appear to endorse armed struggle against Israel in what analyst calls an ‘unanticipated shift’ in stance
  • However, others say comparisons between speech at World Court and Mao-era rhetoric are overstated, noting Beijing still favours a two-state solution
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Salph@infosec.pub 13 points 7 months ago

The USSR would've simply directly funded and/or militarily supported Hamas, Hezbollah, etc. And they did do so with with the PFLP until the USSR was overthrown.

Though ig two superpowers militarily supporting opposide sides has the risk of just turning the place into a warzone like what happened with Afghanistan.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago

Though ig two superpowers militarily supporting opposide sides has the risk of just turning the place into a warzone like what happened with Afghanistan.

Honestly a warzone is better that what's happening now.

[-] fishos@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

I feel like this is exactly what's happening. China isn't jumping in because their pro-palenstine. Theyre jumping in because they're anti US. This will only drag on and worsen the conflict as it becomes one giant proxy war.

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
73 points (91.0% liked)

World News

32286 readers
659 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS