this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
315 points (93.6% liked)

politics

31416 readers
2485 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givitashot@lemmynsfw.com 54 points 3 years ago (5 children)

First the turtle and now this. Fucking term limits are needed!

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 21 points 3 years ago

We need to ban lifetime appointments while we're at it.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago

Nah, this has been an ongoing issue with her for months if not years. She is often confused when press is actually able to talk with her.

Geriatric mutant ninja turtle just happened to have a much more obvious and blatant episode live on national TV.

[–] oSillyScope@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 years ago

And age limits.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 children)

AGE limits. Fuck Biden, fuck Trump, fuck Feinstein, fuck the turtle. There should be NO 80 year olds in office period.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

It might sound horribly ageist, but I’m inclined to agree. Representing the interests of millions upon millions of people is an incredibly taxing and demanding job, which nobody in their 80s should still be doing; especially not without some sort of fitness test.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago

I think a fitness test is very fair.

[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Term limits are absolutely needed, along with age limits on how old you can be while in office. Using 65 as an example, if you'll turn 65 while in office, too bad, you're intelligible to run.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago

Term limits have been put in place in several cities and states too I believe, and they've resulted in more corruption and lower quality governance. It's the worst possible outcome.

Think about the type of person who could afford to run for Congress for a few terms. They're probably retired and/or wealthy. This just entrenches them in power even more. And it seems there is a skillset that politicians pick up over their tenure.