this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
53 points (81.9% liked)

Apple

17595 readers
55 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
MichelleG@lemmy.world
thisisdee@lemmy.world
RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world
53
Features lost across versions of macOS (talk.tidbits.com)
submitted 9 months ago by redcalcium@lemmy.institute to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

I've been using OS X / macOS for over 20 years now, often alongside some Linux or *BSD distro or another. For the past 10 I've been exclusively using macOS, but recently I've started thinking of ditching it for Linux.

The OS just gets more closed down over time, includes more and more really fucking creepy surveillance features, loses actually useful features, and gains bugs. Apple also has an incredibly annoying habit of coming up with new and possibly useful features that they introduce and then just leave to languish, or replace with a similar but more broken one; Automator & Shortcuts is a pretty good example of this. Or Aperture & iPhoto/Photos.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

Yes every macOS and Windows upgrade I've done at least in the last decade has felt like a downgrade where I lost something significant I was using regularly and gained nothing useful whatsoever.

[–] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 0 points 9 months ago

Oo, that seems useful, thanks for the tip

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

I'm with you. It was always about the intuitive nature of the OS, and things just working, for me. All that seems to have gone out the window, and my ecosystem is just as frustrating as Windows at this point. I've been a MacOS user since 2007.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

KDE neon is pretty slick. Plasma 6 is a big step. Still lacks a decent replacement for Photoshop (no, gimp sucks).

[–] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I didn’t want to run wine

[–] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough. I wish Affinity would release a client on Linux but that's clearly never going to happen.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Which is really too bad, because they would dominate the Linux market.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why pay for Photoshop when Photopea is free and does what 90% of Photoshop users actually need to do? Also, GIMP has come a long way, it's more usable than ever and gets better with every new release.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

Photopea is ad driven, and web based. Which means it’s going to be slower. And I agree GIMP has come a long way, but it’s not a competitor. I use Affinity Photo on my Mac, and I’ve found it to be a good replacement. I do wish they would release a Linux binary.