I'd support removing the post.

CEPA receives funding from various donors, including major technology companies such as Google and Amazon Web Services and key players in the defense industry like Lockheed Martin and BAE Systems. While they list supporters, CEPA doesn’t disclose specific financial amounts. This lack of transparency among think tanks raises concerns about potential biases in their research and publications.

@tillimarleen @poVoq

I won't advocate for the source (nor for some otber sources in this comm, but that's a different story), which is why I barely use Cepa as you can see from my posting history. Nor would I choose the same harsh words to describe my stance towards Mr. Scholz and his government. The reason why I posted this piece is because I feel somewhat confused about Germany's politics across a wide range of issues, and it goes in a similar direction across a variety of issues.

For example, Mr. Scholz has just met with officials from Malaysia and other Asian countries to stregthens ties with them and to cut dependence from China, but he has been supporting China in its intentions to become a shareholder of the Port of Hamburg (contrary to the recommendation of six of his own ministers). Not long ago Mr. Scholz joint protesters against the country's far right-wing AfD, but he also told media that Germany 'must deport in grand style'.

I don't understand that. What does Mr. Scholz stand for?

But that's just my opinion. Feel free to delete tbe post if you think it's inappropriate.