view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
This article does feel a bit light on the details. I found this MSN article, which is an opinion piece, but lays out just who exactly all these people are and their relationships with each other.
It seems Bradley worked with Wade, but was fired for sexual harrassment. There is another person, Robin Yeartie, who was also let go from the DA's office. Both of them are the only 2 people saying Wade and Willis were dating before they made it public. Both have a potential grudge, worth slinging mud while not under oath, but since both were lawyers, now the reality of what perjuring themselves in a case this big would do to them seems to have hit home and they've developed amnesia.
ETA: For anyone not reading the article, the text messages in the headline are not anything along the lines of proof showing they had a relationship, just Bradley ranting about how he was sure there was something, of which he has now changed his tune and says he may have overstated things, and these texts are now, I believe, are trying to be used by the Trump team to get Bradley to cooperate with them again.
Frankly, The Office did this whole dating impropriety thing much better...