436
submitted 5 months ago by cosmicrookie@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I might have misunderstood this but is Android really trying to push this as tracking as a privacy upgrade, simply because it let's us choose which of our interests we want advertisers to have access to?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fisch@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

MicroG is open source tho and only talks to Google if you explicitely activate it

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

No its not. They download Google Binaries which run as system apps and have privileged access.

They practice badness enumeration in some form, while their permission model (only activating what is needed) is a better approach but incomplete.

Any app that relies on Play has those libraries implemented, so they could show ads etc. on their own. But with microG they have a component with privileged system access, in contrast to sandboxed play where no component is privileged.

[-] Fisch@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

That's completely false, where did you get that info from?

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

GrapheneOS discuss. Their Github repo looks like they actually have the sources for everything.

this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
436 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

30739 readers
819 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS